Middle school cyber victimization: Outcomes, grade and gender differences, and the overlap with traditional victimization
by Brown, Christina Flynn, M.A., NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY, 2011, 140 pages; 1506277

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to develop a psychometrically sound measure of cyber victimization that could be used to identify cyber victims and outcomes associated with cyber victimization. Research on cyberbullying is still relatively young. Current estimates are that as many as 20% to 40% of children and adolescents report experiencing cyberbullying.

To date, measures of cyberbullying have been limited in focus and have demonstrated relatively poor psychometric properties. Many researchers have relied on measures and data collected for other purposes. Although researchers have created measures to investigate cyberbullying behaviors, these instruments have relatively poor psychometric properties.

Outcomes associated with cyberbullying have been found to be comparable to those associated with traditional bullying. Cyberbullying experiences have been linked to traditional bullying behaviors, school problems, including tardiness and truancy, and substance use. It can also cause psychological, emotional and academic problems.

The results of this study indicate that the Cyber Victimization Survey (CVS) is a reliable and valid tool for identifying cyber victims. In addition, this study demonstrates that levels of cyber victimization do not differ by grade or by gender, cyber victimization and traditional victimization are distinct but related constructs, and relations between cyber victimization and outcomes vary by gender with girls suffering more than boys. This study also confirmed that traditional bullying continues to be significantly related to a number of negative outcomes for all students. These findings as well as implications and the direction of future research are discussed.

 
AdviserMichelle Demaray
SchoolNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY
SourceMAI/ 50-04, p. , Feb 2012
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsBehavioral sciences; Developmental psychology
Publication Number1506277
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1506277
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.