Occupational radiation dose to persons involved in veterinary positron emission tomography
by Martinez, Nicole, M.S., COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY, 2011, 160 pages; 1503675

Abstract:

Several studies have been conducted concerning the dose to hospital personnel from positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals, but to date no specific parallel studies have been done for veterinary PET technologists. Compared to human PET imaging, veterinary personnel are potentially interacting with animal patients for a longer time period, sometimes in close physical proximity, because of the need for anesthetizing patients. There is no equivalent data on personnel exposure from human PET imaging; human patients are not anesthetized and are kept in an isolated room after injection until their imaging procedure. Although veterinary personnel may be interacting more closely with animal patients undergoing PET imaging, radiopharmaceutical doses are generally smaller for animal patients because they weigh less on average. Considering these and other differences between human and veterinary practice, this study aimed to determine, on a per patient basis, the dose to personnel working with PET at Colorado State University's (CSU) James L. Voss Veterinary Teaching Hospital (VTH). Electronic personal dosimeters (EPDs) and supplemental optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters were used (in addition to regular dosimetry) to determine radiation doses to veterinary personnel over a period of four months. Participants in the study included nuclear medicine technologists, the on-duty anesthesiology technologist, and occasionally an observer. Individual doses, along with the details of the staff member's activities, were recorded for available personnel for each PET study. Twenty-five scans were conducted over the course of this study: thirteen different dogs, six different cats, and a sheep (with two cats and three dogs having repeat scans). The mass range of the animals was 2.8 to 76.5 kg, with an average of 28.9 kg. The average amount of activity injected was 6 MBq per kg. The dose range for the nuclear medicine technologists was 0 to 30 μSv (7.8 μSv average), for the anesthetist 1 to 22 μSv (8.3 μSv average), and for the observer 0 to 2 μSv (0.4 μSv average).

 
AdviserThomas E. Johnson
SchoolCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceMAI/ 50-03, p. , Jan 2012
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsEnvironmental health; Medical imaging and radiology; Veterinary medicine
Publication Number1503675
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» This is an open access dissertation.
  Use the link below to access the full text PDF of this graduate work:
  http://gradworks.umi.com/1503675.pdf
  Use the link below to search and retrieve all open access dissertations:
  http://pqdtopen.proquest.com

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.