Cell death trigger defines differential immune responses from self-tolerance to inflammation
by Perez, Beatriz H., M.S., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON, 2011, 116 pages; 1498119

Abstract:

The mammalian immune system must respond to millions of cells that die in the body each day as result of normal cell turnover, infection, exposure to cytotoxic substances, trauma, and other factors. Depending on the context and death trigger, cells undergo different death processes, including apoptosis and necrosis. These dying or dead cells are swiftly recognized and phagocytosed by immune cells including macrophages and dendritic cells. The mechanisms by which these cells are recognized and internalized are still not fully understood. Furthermore these mechanisms appear to depend on what mode of cell death has occurred. In this study, the immune responses of macrophages to cells killed using different death triggers were analyzed. Jurkat T cells were killed via apoptosis using two chemotherapy agents, actinomycin D and etoposide. It was observed that actinomycin D-killed cells suppress the immune response in macrophages and block the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, whereas etoposide-killed cells do not. Further characterization of actinomycin D-killed cells showed that actinomycin D, and not the apoptotic cells, was responsible for the immunosuppression of the immune system. In addition, it was observed that necrotic cells were not sufficient on their own to simulate the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. However, Jurkat T cells killed by 55°C treatment, but not freeze-thaw, had a synergistic effect on LPS-stimulated macrophages. This study underscores the importance of understanding the mechanisms that underlie how different cell death stimuli impact and regulate immunological outcomes, especially when these cells are being used in surrogate in vitro systems to study in vivo phenomena.

 
AdviserRachel C. Skvirsky
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON
SourceMAI/ 50-01, p. , Sep 2011
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsBiology; Cellular biology; Immunology
Publication Number1498119
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1498119
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.