Colonoware, creolization, and interactions between African Americans and Native Americans during the colonial period in the South Carolina Lowcountry
by Brilliant, M. Brooke, M.A., UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 2011, 223 pages; 1492479

Abstract:

Colonoware, a broad category of low-fired, handbuilt ceramics representing Native American, African American, and European traditions, is a tangible result of the interactions between Native Americans and African Americans in the South Carolina Lowcountry during the Colonial Period. The colonowares found in association with the Lord Ashley Settlement site (38DR83A), dating from 1674 to around 1685; and the pre-Drayton occupation, dating to the 1720s; and the John Drayton occupation, dating from 1738 to 1779 located at the Drayton Hall site (38CH225) provide an opportunity to explore the nature of the interactions between Native Americans and African Americans at these locations. Two broad types of colonoware have been found in association with each of these occupations. These include colonowares primarily associated with urban and plantation contexts occupied by enslaved African Americans and those primarily found in association with historic Native American sites. Creolization and stylistic approaches are used to interpret how a comparison of these colonowares contributes information about the interactions and social boundary construction, maintenance and shifts between Native Americans and African Americans at these occupations. This research reveals that the interactions between Native Americans and African Americans varied through the Colonial period and were shaped by trade, slavery, and warfare. Colonoware is found to reflect the way in which enslaved people enacted their agency by constructing and negotiating social boundaries through the emphasis and de-emphasis of Native American, African and European traditions and the creation of new traditions.

 
AdviserKenneth G. Kelly
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
SourceMAI/ 49-05, p. , Jun 2011
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsAfrican American studies; Archaeology
Publication Number1492479
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1492479
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.