Networked neighborhood: Hyperlocal media and community engagement in Columbia Heights, Washington, D.C.
by Hadge, Kara A., M.A., GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, 2011, 207 pages; 1491371

Abstract:

Are new media really detrimental to civic engagement? While many have argued that the Internet has led to a sense of detachment among local communities, this study contends that new media actually reinforce local community engagement. Specifically, this study analyzes hyperlocal media through a case study of the Columbia Heights neighborhood in Washington, D.C. Through the application of literature on the public sphere, civic engagement, uses and gratifications theory, communicative ecologies, and the knowledge city, this study embraces an interdisciplinary approach to understanding the effects of multiple new media technologies on community life. A content analysis of hyperlocal blogs, list-servs, Twitter, and Facebook groups found that hyperlocal media were more likely than mainstream media to provide information on neighborhood-specific politics, crime, events, and real estate, and also spurred more conversation. Survey results found a positive correlation between hyperlocal media use and community engagement. Those who contributed to or interacted with hyperlocal media were more likely to display offline community engagement than those who merely followed such media. However, a social network analysis of Twitter users found online engagement within that medium was less vibrant: The ties among Twitter users were predominantly “following” relationships and exhibited few instances of direct communication or interaction. Taken as individual sources, then, hyperlocal media do not provide all a community’s communication and information needs. Rather, each medium fulfills a specific role, and in the aggregate, these technologies do meet the needs of a niche audience. This project was originally presented as a website and is best viewed at https://commons.georgetown.edu/blogs/networkedneighborhood . HTML files of this website are included as supplementary material to this document.

 
AdviserDiana Owen
SchoolGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
SourceMAI/ 49-05, p. , May 2011
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsJournalism; Communication; Political Science
Publication Number1491371
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1491371
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.