White Matter Integrity in Individuals at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study
by Lancaster, Melissa A., M.S., ROSALIND FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE, 2011, 69 pages; 1488371

Abstract:

Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) studies have confirmed changes in white matter integrity in normal aging which appear more pronounced in both Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Few DTI studies have examined asymptomatic individuals at risk for AD, and most have focused solely on changes in fractional anisotropy (FA). In this study, we compared three other DTI indices, mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (DA), and radial diffusivity (DR) in addition to FA, in cognitively intact older participants who differed on AD risk factors (APOE 4 allele and family history). The At-Risk group had a positive family history of AD and one or both Apolipoprotein (APOE) ϵ4 alleles (n = 29) and the No-Risk group had neither risk factor (n = 29). There were no group differences on age, education, sex, or cognitive status. Groups were compared on four DTI indices, using both tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) and region of interest (ROI) approaches. The At-Risk group showed widespread, bilateral increase in DA, and to a lesser extent in DR and MD, relative to the No-Risk group. In contrast, no group differences were observed in FA. Good correspondence was observed between the ROI and TBSS analyses. FA was most correlated with measures of memory, while radial diffusivity and especially axial diffusivity showed less relation to cognitive variables. These findings suggest that DTI indices of diffusivity, especially in the axial direction, may be a useful biomarker in identifying older persons at risk for AD. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine if these DTI indices can play a role in the prediction of future cognitive decline in asymptomatic individuals.

 
AdviserMichael Seidenberg
SchoolROSALIND FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE
SourceMAI/ 49-03, p. , Feb 2011
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsNeurosciences; Psychobiology; Clinical psychology
Publication Number1488371
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1488371
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.