"Passive resistance": 1, Supreme Court: 0. The failure of school desegregation in Richmond, Virginia
by Campbell, Margaret Chambers, M.A.L.S., GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, 2010, 93 pages; 1483561

Abstract:

This thesis investigates the politics, people, and law surrounding the desegregation efforts of Richmond, Virginia's public schools. Sources of information include newspaper and magazine articles, court cases, books, interview transcripts, online historical collections, and personal paper collections. Research findings include a better understanding of how the school desegregation battle in Richmond was shaped by interpretation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment by the courts. Another discovery was how Senator Harry Byrd's previously unfaltering grip on Virginia politics was unable to survive the collapse of the Massive Resistance movement by the state's conservatives, which he spearheaded. Finally, the research showed that a surprisingly small number of people - attorneys, politicians, judges, reporters - so greatly influenced the fate of Richmond's public school integration. The research supports the conclusion that public school desegregation in Richmond was ultimately a failure. This failure was a result of several factors, including Richmond's more moderate delaying tactics, known as "passive resistance", which allowed segregation to remain largely intact in Richmond public schools for sixteen years. Additional factors in the failure of integration include the dramatic demographic shifts among public school students, largely a result of "white flight" to surrounding suburbs, and the courts' limited reach in effectively mandating meaningful public school integration. Collectively, these factors resulted in the failure of public school desegregation in Richmond.

 
AdviserRory F. Quirk
SchoolGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
SourceMAI/ 49-03, p. , Jan 2011
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsAmerican studies; American history; Political Science
Publication Number1483561
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1483561
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.