Analysis of lifecycle water requirements of alternative energy pathways: Case study of ethanol from corn grain and crop residue, and electricity from geothermal resources
by Mishra, Gouri Shankar, M.S., UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS, 2010, 148 pages; 1482845

Abstract:

This document describes the methodology and results of analysis of lifecycle water requirements of three renewable fuel pathways – ethanol from corn grain and crop residue (Section I); and electricity from geothermal resources (Section II).

The model for ethanol from corn grain and corn cob is based on default or user inputs of crop evapotranspiration, pre-irrigation requirements for salt leaching, irrigation methods and their efficiencies, conversion technologies, and projected crop yields. Water requirements also depend upon allocation procedures selected at various stages of the lifecycle. The model characterizes water requirements in terms of withdrawal and consumption; and source – ground water, surface water, precipitation, and soil moisture.

The geothermal model estimates water requirements of electricity from various forms of geothermal resources. It considers two types of hydrothermal resources – wet steam and hot water; as well as enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). Electricity can be generated using flash or binary (organic Rankine cycle) depending upon the temperature and pressure of geothermal fluid. Power plants can use four different types of cooling technologies – wet re-circulating, dry systems and finally hybrid cooling systems. Requirements are calculated separately for freshwater, degraded water and geothermal fluid.

The study’s conclusion is that corn ethanol and geothermal electricity have higher water requirements than conventional fuels they are replacing. In case of ethanol, requirements are many orders of magnitude higher than that of gasoline. In case of geothermal electricity; freshwater requirements are around 2-5 times higher than water requirements of conventional thermoelectricity. Geothermal electricity generation also requires large volumes of degraded water.

As part of the project, two spreadsheet based models were developed which are available at http://steps.ucdavis.edu/research/Thread_6/lcfs/water. These models were used to calculate water requirements for the two fuel pathways based on various scenario assumptions.

 
AdviserSonia Yeh
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS
SourceMAI/ 49-02, p. , Dec 2010
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsAlternative energy; Water resources management; Sustainability; Environmental science
Publication Number1482845
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1482845
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.