Linguistic landscape of "Little Russia by the Sea," A multilingual community in a Brooklyn Area of New York City
by Litvinskaya, Alena A., M.A., INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, 2010, 186 pages; 1479533

Abstract:

The immigrants to the United States from the countries, former republics of the Soviet Union, represent a unique amalgam of ethnicities, religions, cultures, and languages. However, despite their differences, often amplified by the stereotypes brought along from the (former) Soviet Union and political tensions between the existing nation-states, they form communities on the basis of common language (Russian) and common past (Soviet). Unfortunately, the phenomenon has been under-researched, with only a handful of studies of Russian-speaking immigrant neighborhoods.

This study characterizes the so called “Little Russia by the Sea,” a small multiethnic and multilingual neighborhood in the Brooklyn borough of New York. I conducted a linguistic landscape study of the area by analyzing the language usage in the public space, which has proven to be an effective approach to studying multilingual communities. In particular, I combined a quantitative analysis of the languages displayed on the business fronts in “Little Russia,” according to their business types and the types of signs they have, with the detailed qualitative analysis of five representative English-Russian business fronts. I focused on the role of the Russian language in the community and its status based on its representations in the linguistic landscape of “Little Russia.”

The study showed the dominance of English as the language of power and wider communication and the presence of the Russian language on more than half of the business fronts. Other languages spoken by the immigrants from the former Soviet Union were present on only one or two business fronts. The Russian language was used for three major purposes: servicing (offering products and services to Russian-speaking population), material (goods made in Russia), and sentimental (appealing to collective identity and evoking memories from the Soviet culture). The text on business fronts also revealed various combinations of code-switching and transliterations of Russian and English.

Further research is needed to study emigre Russian displayed in the public space in “Little Russia” as well as linguistic landscape studies of other Russian-speaking neighborhoods to see how they negotiate languages, cultures, and past and present.

 
AdviserDavid I. Hanauer
SchoolINDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
SourceMAI/ 49-01, p. , Nov 2010
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsAmerican studies; Sociolinguistics
Publication Number1479533
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1479533
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.