Does democracy influence the export of terrorism?
by Nitz, Eric Richard, M.P.P., GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, 2011, 63 pages; 1474911

Abstract:

This study uses two-country gravity models to examine whether terrorists export terrorism from non-democratic countries to democratic countries and whether the ease of using the internet to publicize a terrorist event in a country motivates this export. When the characteristics of both the host country and the origin country are included in a PROBIT model predicting the probability that at least one terrorist attack will occur between the two countries in a given year, the democracy level of the host country increases the probability, at a decreasing rate, that an attack will result while the democracy level of the origin country exerted no effect. Additionally, the specific scenario of export from a non-democratic origin to a democratic host exerted no effect beyond the independent effect of the democracy level in each individual country—country pairs involving a non-democratic origin country and a democratic host were no more likely to participate in a terrorist attack than any other pairing of countries. The specific scenario of a non-democratic target country and a democratic host country, however, did increase the likelihood that the two countries would participate in a terrorist attack, suggesting that terrorists attempt to circumvent the logistical hurdles of waging a terrorist attack in a non-democratic country by targeting citizens of that country in a democratic host country. Additionally, when the target country and the host country differed, the number of internet users in the target country increased the probability that the two countries would experience a terrorist attack. The number of internet users in the origin country, however, did not influence the likelihood of attack when the host and the origin country differed. This dichotomy suggests either that terrorists’ true audience is the populace of the target country, rather than the populace of the origin country, or that terrorists use modes of communication other than the internet to publicize their attacks within the populace of their own country.

 
AdviserYuriy Pylypchuk
SchoolGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
SourceMAI/ 48-04, p. , May 2010
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsPolitical Science; Public policy
Publication Number1474911
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1474911
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.