"The perfect scheme of it in his head..." Shaftesbury's Carolina design in the context of England's Atlantic political economy
by Fair, Francesca J., M.A., UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 2009, 106 pages; 1473001

Abstract:

At the dawn of England’s Restoration, mercantilist minded men were filled with fresh ambitions to enrich the nation and themselves by way of new colonizing ventures. Settlement schemes were proposed for lands in far flung places ranging from Tangier, Bombay, and the Gambia to Saint Lucia, Saint Eustatius, New Jersey, and the Carolinas. The Carolina charter of 1663 represented England’s first serious attempt to make advances into the American southeast. Its success was critical in the geopolitical battle between European nations to gain hegemony over the North American mainland. Historians have long agreed the region’s eight Lords Proprietors planned from the very outset to develop a staples-producing plantation export economy, thereby establishing the most valuable of mercantile colonies. Yet, these metropolitan masters were far from a homogenous group. Each had his own motives and aspirations for entering into this charter agreement, Lord Shaftesbury being the most inspired. This thesis explores his compulsions in the design and development of a new export market for this region, in the context of England’s pre- and post-Restoration Atlantic economy. It suggests that far from a singular desire to establish a trade in agricultural-staples, Shaftesbury was fully cognizant and planned to take full advantage of any and all opportunities the region afforded – most notably a trade with Native Americans for deerskins and furs. That he did so destabilizes the notion Carolina’s ‘Indian trade’ was born out of settler agency or a subversion of the proprietary dream. It thereby reorients current understandings of the development of Carolina’s early economy and contributes to an appreciation of Shaftesbury’s lasting legacy in the region that, by the time of America’s Revolution, became the wealthiest colony in all British North America.

 
AdviserDaniel C. Littlefield
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
SourceMAI/ 48-03, p. , Feb 2010
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsEuropean history; American history
Publication Number1473001
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1473001
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.