Sociocultural tailoring in breast cancer websites: A content analysis
by Herrman-Rose, Brandi, M.A., UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA, 2008, 76 pages; 1472123

Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to examine breast cancer websites to determine the extent to which sociocultural cues, relevant to African Americans, are used to convey information in websites. Based on the literature, sociocultural factors include collectivism, spirituality/religiosity and racial pride. Additionally, this study uses a unique search option to determine the extent to which breast cancer websites target African American women with these sociocultural cues. The rationale for this study is that African American women are a high-risk segment for breast cancer; therefore, it is important to examine the extent to which message cues that resonate with this segment are used in breast cancer websites that this segment searches for health information about breast cancer. The study adds to existing literature by comparing the presence of sociocultural factors in government, nonprofit and commercial websites that provide information about breast cancer. The goal is to determine whether or not differences exist in both the frequency and type of sociocultural factors on these sites. The method was a content analysis of 50 breast cancer websites. Ethnic targeting of African Americans was present in some of the websites coded, though the use of targeting varied from zero to as many as 2,672. There was limited use of sociocultural cues; collectivism was the most dominant cue used, followed by spirituality and racial pride. There were no instances of religiosity. Government websites (versus non-profit or commercial) were most likely to provide information that targeted African Americans. In short, while there is a moderate use of targeting, the use of sociocultural cues that would resonate with African Americans are largely absent in breast cancer websites.

 
AdviserShelly Rodgers
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA
SourceMAI/ 48-02, p. , Dec 2009
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsJournalism; Public health; Web studies; Mass communication; Information science; Oncology
Publication Number1472123
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1472123
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.