The effects of using a verbal reciprocal summarization protocol on high school students' comprehension of agricultural animal science presentations
by Ermis, Grant Lee, M.A., UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS, 2009, 42 pages; 1471214

Abstract:

A verbal reciprocal summarization protocol was used to help increase student's levels of concept retention. This strategy prompted students to think abstractly and synthesize real life responses from conceptual instruction. The intervention was expected to have a positive impact on student's ability to develop the main and supporting ideas of classroom concepts, and justify their responses with supporting facts. It was also meant to increase conceptual understanding of material presented in class in order that it was practically applied. This intervention was conducted with 22 high school aged students in grades 10–12 of 1 animal science course over a period of 20 instructional days. A 3-phase strategy implemented a 4-question summary review prompt after conceptual instruction, which was modeled after a combination of two different literature based protocols. Students used the 4-question prompt to develop a summary and deliver it verbal to their peers prior to examination. Results show that students were less comfortable with the material presented over the course of the intervention, but came out with a sense of knowledge about the concepts that was more equivalent to their peers. Students were found to have been more successful at deducing main ideas from conceptual instruction when analyzed in written summaries. Attention levels increased as the intervention progressed with students being more focused and on task further into a single class period. Overall, students showed improved summary writing abilities in conjunction with increased abilities to synthesize main ideas within responses to open-ended questions utilizing information from conceptual instruction.

 
AdviserPhil R. Smith
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS
SourceMAI/ 48-01, p. , Dec 2009
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsSecondary education; Science education
Publication Number1471214
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1471214
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.