The utility of metacarpal bone length in the determination of sex and race
by Collins, Katherine A., M.A., THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, 2010, 62 pages; 1470325

Abstract:

Numerous recent studies address the use of metacarpals in the determination of sex and race. However, most of these studies rely on multiple measurements of metacarpal bone robusticity, which are affected by lifestyle activity and can mask underlying racial and sexual dimorphism. Measurements of length, however, are arguably less affected by these factors. The present study investigates the utility of metacarpal length, to the exclusion of other measures of shape and size, in sex and race determination. Two criteria for utility are established: (1) metacarpal length has enough power of discrimination to accurately predict sex, and (2) the analysis of metacarpal length measurements can simultaneously assign sex and race, without the necessity for additional bone inclusion.

Using a sample (n=100) of black and white males and females, maximum axial length measurements were taken for right and left hand metacarpals. Pooled, race-specific, and sex-specific discriminant functions were generated for sex and race determination. Functions were then applied to a second sample (n=20) to establish their degree of accuracy. The highest cross-validated accuracy rate was generated from male right metacarpals using sex-specific discriminant functions in race determination (80–88%, cross-validated). Sex-specific race determination functions also produced the lowest accuracy rate when applied to left female metacarpals (44–68%, cross-validated). Overall, accuracy rates for sex (71.17%, cross-validated) and race (72%, cross-validated) determination were lower than previous studies, suggesting that metacarpal bone length, as a variable, is not robust enough to stand on its own in sex and race determination.

 
AdviserDouglas H. Ubelaker
SchoolTHE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
SourceMAI/ 48-02, p. , Dec 2009
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsPhysical anthropology; Forensic anthropology
Publication Number1470325
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» This is an open access dissertation.
  Use the link below to access the full text PDF of this graduate work:
  http://gradworks.umi.com/1470325.pdf
  Use the link below to search and retrieve all open access dissertations:
  http://pqdtopen.proquest.com

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.