Tillage erosion coefficients for selected tillage tools
by Mollinedo, Javier, M.S., SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2008, 146 pages; 1468900

Abstract:

Soil loss as a result of differential translocation of soil by tillage is widespread in regions with irregular topography. Tillage erosion models are based on field derived transport coefficients that are specific to the tillage tool being used. Variables like speed and depth of tillage can modify tillage erosion transport coefficients. Four treatments were established for this research: moldboard plow, chisel plow, tandem disk, and no-till drill. The primary research site was located in Rock County MN, 43°39'40.24"N, and 96°24'17.25"W, with a fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Cumulic Endoaquolls (USDA, 2006). The objectives of this study were to measure tillage erosion coefficients for selected equipment. A method for estimating the movement of soil by tillage equipment was developed utilizing metallic washers and a magnetic sweep. This method had a high soil tracer (99%) retrieval rate for the plot treatments. A linear regression analysis model was applied to the mean weighted translocation distance for all the treatments. Additional studies to measure the variation on the depth of tillage were implemented for moldboard plow at two different depths, 10 and 20 cm. Internal plot variation in experimental technique was estimated by using two different colors of tracers. The bulk density average for all treatments was 1.37 g cm-3. Highly significant differences on depth of tillage were found between treatments. Tillage erosion coefficients (ktil) obtained for the treatments were moldboard plow 313 kg m-1, chisel plow 158 kg m-1, tandem disk 69 kg m-1, and no-till drill 4 kg m-1. Regression analysis of the internal replication values showed that depth of tillage had a greater impact on tillage erosion coefficient variability than factors related to tracer retrieval.

 
AdviserThomas E. Schumacher
SchoolSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceMAI/ 48-01, p. , Oct 2009
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsAgronomy; Geophysics; Soil sciences
Publication Number1468900
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1468900
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.