Differential expression of pro- and anti-apoptotic genes under the influence of oxidative stress during CCL4-mediated liver injury in mice
by Patel, Chirag, M.S., LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY, THE BROOKLYN CENTER, 2009, 45 pages; 1468870

Abstract:

Despite the fact that past few decades made substantial progress in the understanding of the mechanisms of the liver injury, it has not been possible to design non-hepatotoxic drugs or identify 'very-effective' and 'clinically-safe' antidotes. This is because our comprehension of drug or chemically-induced mechanisms of cell injury and cell death at the molecular level is incomplete. From a mechanistic standpoint, CCL4-mediated liver injury has emerged as a prominent model. Therefore, this study investigated modulation of a series of key death regulatory genes, such as, Bcl-2, Bcl-xl, Bax, Bad, p53 during the progression of liver injury. Female ICR mice (28-35g) were gavaged with hepatotoxic doses of CCL4 (1 ml/kg) in corn oil, and sacrificed 0, 6, 12, 18, 24 h later. Blood was collected for serum chemistry analysis and livers for measurement of oxidative stress (MDA, SOD, Nitrate+Nitrite) and western blot analysis. CCL4-induced massive liver injury was confirmed by increases in ALT activity (U/L in CON: 56±10, 6hr: 195±41, 12hr: 1322±913, 18hr: 20635±1678). Biochemical analysis of the livers reflected corresponding changes in lipid peroxidation, nitric oxide production, genomic DNA fragmentation and SOD activity. Expression of both pro- and anti-apoptotic genes (Bax, Bad, Bcl-2, Bcl-xl) including p53 and Cyt-c were significantly elevated at 18 and 24 hr. Collectively, this study described important changes in the expression of multiple genes during CCL 4-induced oxidative stress which may potentially play roles during CCL 4-hepatotoxicity, and extended our understanding of some of the complex interplay between pro- and cell-death regulating genes during the process of liver injury.

 
AdviserSidhartha D. Ray
SchoolLONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY, THE BROOKLYN CENTER
SourceMAI/ 48-01, p. , Oct 2009
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsToxicology; Pharmacology
Publication Number1468870
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1468870
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.