The myth of sex offender specialization revisited: Comparing sex offenders involved in violent and nonviolent non-sex offenses
by Magers, Megan, M.S., UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE, 2009, 52 pages; 1468582

Abstract:

Two commonly researched topics surrounding sexual offending are recidivism and specialization. The widely-accepted belief that sex offenders recidivate at a higher rate than other offenders, in conjunction with the misconception that sex offenders specialize in purely sexual crimes, while ignoring the likelihood of their involvement in general criminality, has compelled policymakers to enact legislation with extremely harsh sanctions.

This thesis seeks to measure the accuracy of the aforementioned perceptions through an analysis of the non-sex crimes for which a sample of 229 registered sex offenders are currently incarcerated in the state of Kentucky. The primary focus of the current study is to explore the heterogeneity of sex offenders as a whole, by assessing the differences in criminal behavior and offender characteristics of sex offenders that are currently incarcerated for non-sex violent and non-sex nonviolent offenses.

The results of the bivariate analysis suggested that the following variables were significantly different between those sex offenders with a nonviolent non-sex offense and those with a violent non-sex offense: offender age, race, victim age, registration violation, multiple victims, and sex offense severity. Furthermore, the multivariate analysis revealed that sex offenders with a victim under the age of 18 and with a registration violation are less likely to be violent offenders, and that those sex offenders with multiple victims are more likely to be violent offenders. Study limitations and the implications of these findings with regard to registration and community notification policies are also discussed.

 
Advisor
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE
SourceMAI/ 47-06, p. , Oct 2009
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsPublic administration; Criminology
Publication Number1468582
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1468582
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.