Physiological determinants of the Candidate Physical Ability Test in firefighters
by Sheaff, Andrew Kirkham, M.A., UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK, 2009, 78 pages; 1467679

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to examine the relative importance of physiological characteristics during firefighting performance, as assessed by the Candidate Physical Ability Test (CPAT). Participants included professional and volunteer firefighters, ages 18-39 (n=33). Muscle strength, muscle endurance, muscle power, body composition, aerobic capacity, anaerobic fitness, and the cardiovascular response to stairclimbing were assessed to determine the physiological characteristics of the participants. To quantify firefighting performance, the CPAT was administered by members of the fire service. Absolute and relative mean power during Wingate anaerobic cycling test (WAnT), relative peak power during WAnT, and absolute maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) were significantly higher in those who passed the CPAT (n=18), compared to those who failed (n=15) (P < 0.01). Absolute and relative mean power during WAnT, fatigue index during WAnT, absolute VO2max, upper body strength, and the heart rate response to stairclimbing were all significantly related to CPAT performance time (all P < 0.01). However, absolute VO2max and anaerobic fatigue resistance during WAnT combined were the best predictors of total CPAT performance (Adj. R2 = 0.817; P < 0.001). Performance on the ceiling breach and pull was the only individual CPAT task that could not be significantly predicted by the physiological characteristics assessed. Rate-pressure product during the stairclimb was not related to CPAT performance. In conclusion, measures of anaerobic and aerobic fitness best predict overall CPAT performance, as well as individual task performance. Remedial programs aimed at improving firefighting performance should target anaerobic and aerobic fitness qualities.

 
AdviserBen Hurley
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK
SourceMAI/ 47-06, p. , Sep 2009
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsKinesiology; Physiology
Publication Number1467679
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1467679
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.