Forage species alters animal performance, carcass quality, and fatty acid composition of forage-finished beef produced in summer months
by Schmidt, Jason, M.S., CLEMSON UNIVERSITY, 2009, 101 pages; 1464150

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to evaluate how forages grazed during the summer months alter live animal performance, carcass quality, consumer acceptability and fatty acid composition in finishing beef cattle. Angus-cross steers (n=60) were finished on alfalfa (AL), bermudagrass (BG), chicory (CH), cowpea (CO), and pearl millet (PM) during this two year trial. Using a complete randomized block design, ten 2-ha paddocks were blocked and assigned to forage species (2 reps per species). Each year, steers (n=3) were randomly assigned to paddocks and grazing began when adequate forage growth for individual species was present. Put and take grazing techniques were utilized. Steers were slaughtered when sufficient forage mass for individual forage species was no longer present to support animal gains or when average steer weight exceeded 568 kg. Data were analyzed using PROC MIXED of SAS. Average daily gains were higher for alfalfa (AL) than bermudagrass (BG), cowpea (CO), and pearl millet (PM) treatments, whereas chicory (CH) ADG were higher (P = 0.02) than BG and PM. Dressing percentages were greater (P = 0.01) for AL and CO than BG and PM, while CH was higher than BG. Cowpea carcasses had the highest (P < 0.05) quality grades and marbling scores. A blind consumer taste panel rated beef from AL, CO and PM higher (P < 0.01) in overall palatability than CH and BG. Postmortem aging decreased (P < 0.01) Warner-Bratzler shear force. Shear force scores were lower (P = 0.05) for AL and CO than BG and CH. CLA cis-9, trans-11 concentration was greater (P = 0.05) in BG and PM than other treatments. Chicory and CO treatments had greater concentrations of linolenic acid than other treatments, whereas AL was higher in concentration than PM (P < 0.01). Stearic acid was higher (P = 0.02) in concentration for CO than CH, PM, and AL. Stearic acid concentration was higher (P = 0.02) in BG than PM and AL, and CH was higher than AL.

 
AdviserJohn A. Andrae
SchoolCLEMSON UNIVERSITY
SourceMAI/ 47-05, p. , Jul 2009
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsAnimal sciences; Range management
Publication Number1464150
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1464150
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.