Comparison of treatment outcome of Invisalign(RTM) and traditional fixed orthodontics by model analysis using ABO Objective Grading System
by Fetouh, Omar, M.S., STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO, 2009, 50 pages; 1461733

Abstract:

Introduction. Invisalign® has become one of the very popular treatment modalities requested by patients to straighten their teeth. However, there has been great controversy among clinicians about the effectiveness of this new treatment modality. Indeed, there are very few studies that report the effectiveness and appropriateness of Invisalign®. It was thus the goal of this retrospective study to help clinicians in deciding whether Invisalign® is appropriate to their patients or not. Materials and Methods. Sixty-seven patients with Class I malocclusion, mild crowing and some overbite were included in this study. All cases had Discrepancy Index (DI) less than 5 and were treated non-extraction. All patients had full permanent dentition and no missing teeth. Thirty-four patients were treated with traditional fixed orthodontics (braces group) and 33 patients were treated with Invisalign®. All patients were treated in a private clinic in Buffalo, New York, by the same practitioner. The posttreatment models were graded using the ABO Objective Grading System (OGS) to assess the treatment outcome of both groups. Paired t-test was used to analyze the data collected in this study. Results. There was no statistical significant differences between the scores of the Invisalign® group and Braces group for Alignment (p=0.059), Occlusal Relationship (p=0.223) and Interproximal Contacts. The Invislaign® group had higher scores in Marginal ridges, Bucco-lingual inclination, Occlusal Contacts, and Overjet than Braces group. Conclusion. According to OGS, Invisalign® can treat mild malocclusion with DI less than 5 as efficiently, if not better, as braces. This study helps clinicians to determine which patients are best suited for Invisalign® treatment.

 
AdviserCharles Brian Preston
SchoolSTATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO
SourceMAI/ 47-04, Mar 2009
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsDentistry
Publication Number1461733
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1461733
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.