Relationship between artificial structures and surrounding habitat variables as indicators of potential bat day roosts: Comparative study of patterns in Indiana and Texas
by Poloskey, Tara Michele, M.S., SUL ROSS STATE UNIVERSITY, 2008, 65 pages; 1459587

Abstract:

Bats roosting in highway bridges in the Trans-Pecos region of Texas and that of south-central Indiana were observed to prefer particular bridges for day-roosts over others with identical construction. The null hypothesis states that both vegetation height and canopy cover were the direct cause of this preference. I sampled general bridge characteristics, vegetation height, transect canopy and cone canopy from 10 occupied bridges and 10 unoccupied (control) bridges from Texas and compared them to 10 occupied bridges from Indiana. Structures were highly variable in size, yet colonial roosts occurred in bridges of all span numbers and variable heights and widths. Vegetation and canopy cover were not significantly different between occupied and unoccupied bridges in Texas (P > 0.05). Vegetation and canopy distribution between Indiana and Texas occupied bridges did not show a pattern. These factors were also similar between occupied sites and controls in Texas, indicating that other factors are involved in attracting bats to bridges. Emergence behavior and vegetation data show the Mexican free-tail bat (Tadarida brasiliensis ) emerged toward less vegetation, whereas the big brown bat ( Eptesicus fuscus) emerged toward greater vegetation. Emergence counts were performed on each bridge to estimate population numbers and to indicate a correlation between direction of emergence and vegetation height. This study shows the insignificance of vegetation and canopy in roost choice. Temperature and structure construction are presumed to be factors with greater influence on roost choice.

 
Advisor
SchoolSUL ROSS STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceMAI/ 47-02, p. , Dec 2008
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsEcology; Zoology
Publication Number1459587
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1459587
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.