Teacher prompting to develop conceptual understanding of the alphabetic principle in beginning readers: A descriptive study
by Hart, Nancy, M.Ed., GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY, 2007, 150 pages; 1455357

Abstract:

This study examined teacher prompting during first grade reading intervention sessions to determine what conceptual understandings children must develop in order to understand the alphabetic principle, and what prompts teachers give to develop these understandings. Linguistic units (word, syllable, intra-syllable), phoneme, linguistic processes (detecting, linking, blending, segmenting), and word reading strategies (decoding, analogy, automatic) associated with these conceptual understandings were examined. Five categories of conceptual understanding emerged: Sounds, Letters, Words, Parts of Words, and Whole Words, with eight main conceptual understandings. The conceptual understandings referred to most frequently included: “Words are made up of sounds that are represented by letters in a sequential order (30%),” “Words are made up of parts. (19%),” “Letters represent sounds. (13%),” and “Words can be read and written automatically, without analysis (11%).” The data showed that teachers adjusted prompting in response to student reading development by shifting their focus on conceptual understandings, and by decreasing the number of prompts per lesson as students’ skills developed. Prompts addressed all linguistic units, focusing most frequently on phonemes. All linguistic processes were addressed, however teacher emphasis shifted as students’ abilities developed. Attention to word reading strategies changed as students developed, although decoding was the predominate strategy throughout lessons. Teachers used questioning, modeling, guiding and affirming useful behavior, rather than just telling, in order to develop independent readers. Teacher prompting is the enacted reading curriculum. The findings from this study support the conclusion that expert teachers are the solution to effective reading instruction, and teacher expertise is dependent on effective and ongoing professional development.

 
AdviserBeth LaForce
SchoolGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY
SourceMAI/ 46-05, p. , Jul 2008
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsElementary education; Reading instruction; Curriculum development
Publication Number1455357
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1455357
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.