A systems engineering and ergonomic evaluation of safety and operational effectiveness in traditional firearms design
by Cornell, Michael Austin, M.S., STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON, 2007, 126 pages; 1449065

Abstract:

Historical and traditional rifle design methodology, development, manufacture, and attitudes are evaluated and critically examined from a systems engineering and ergonomic viewpoint. Emphasized in this new perspective is the inseparable nature of the individual components that define the shooter-rifle system and its typical operational characteristics. Unlike traditional viewpoints, this perspective regards the shooter/owner, including his/her beliefs, habits, desires, and preferences, as essential to understanding and determining the operational effectiveness and safety of the system at all times, whether the shooter is physically present or not. This essential realization is supported by examining multiple facets of human factors within the shooter-rifle system, as well as ineffective design intervention strategies historically employed, and emphasizes that traditional approaches to firearm safety have been inadequate and incomplete, resulting in, ineffectual firearms legislation and untold numbers of accidental discharges, as well as increased potential for injury or death. While only a small sample of potential components, behaviors, and policies are thoroughly examined, this investigation suggests that traditional approaches to firearm development and safety devices should seek to incorporate systems engineering and ergonomic techniques to overcome the typical shortcomings, in terms of safety and operational effectiveness, that have historically plagued firearms design and manufacture.

 
AdviserMohammad T. Khasawneh
SchoolSTATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON
SourceMAI/ 46-02, p. , Dec 2007
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsIndustrial engineering; System science
Publication Number1449065
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1449065
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.