The changes midsole cushioning and running surface have on impacts
by Sealine, Brett James, M.S., IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2007, 36 pages; 1443160

Abstract:

Introduction. One of the major factors related to overuse injuries in runners is impact force resulting from the runner hitting the ground at heel strike. (Hreljac et al., 2000). This impact will increase and decrease based on the construction of the running shoe used as well as the type of surface being run on. The purpose of this research was to determine the effects that both midsole cushioning and surface stiffness have on this impact force.

Methods. Six recreation runners running at least 10 miles per week ran a 2.2 km course 3 times at a self selected pace. A variable cushioning running shoe (Adidas One®) was used and set in a low cushioning, high cushioning, or self adjusting cushioning mode for each run. Accelerometers were attached at the leg and forehead to measure impacts and impact attenuation. Accelerometer data were sampled at 512 Hz. The course consisted of the following surfaces: cement, asphalt, dirt, gravel, woodchips, sand, grass, and a wooden suspension bridge. Cohen's D formula was used to calculate effect sizes comparing each shoe and each surface. The values 0.5 and 0.8 were used to determine medium and large effect sizes respectively.

Results. The soft shoe setting had a medium effect (ES=0.66) compared to the hard shoe setting. No medium or large effects were found in head acceleration or impact attenuation between shoes. Sand had the largest leg accelerations of 7.8 g's while the wooden bridge had the smallest (6.3 g's). Large effects were found in leg acceleration with sand and 3 different surfaces. Gravel had the largest head acceleration of 1.58 g's. Only medium effects were present between surfaces when comparing head accelerations. Sand had the highest impact attenuation of 83.8% while gravel had the smallest impact attenuation of 77.2%.

Discussion. Two of the softest surfaces (sand and grass) had the highest leg accelerations. This is believed to be due to changes made in kinematics while running on these two surfaces. Altering kinematics will change the effective mass of the body. The decrease in effective mass will increase leg accelerations even though the impact force may not have increased.

 
AdviserTimothy R. Derrick
SchoolIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceMAI/ 45-05, p. , Aug 2007
Source TypeThesis
SubjectsKinesiology; Physiology
Publication Number1443160
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1443160
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.